Our Track Record
- CDAM has consistently outperformed the KLCI since its inception.
- From 27 April 1998 to April 2017, CDAM achieved an impressive compound returns of 13.18% per annum versus a return of 5.66% for the KLCI.
- From 1997 to 2016, CDAM has only recorded four years of negative return in 2008, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
CDAM’s clients include individuals, reputable corporations and institutions. Table 1 below shows the latest performance measurement of CDAM and KLSE Composite Index.
Table 1: Annual Compounded Rate of Return (April 1998 – April 2017)
During bull markets, all fund managers can perform well. The difference between a good fund manager and a lousy fund manager can only be seen during bear markets. As we all know, you will only know who is swimming naked when the tide goes out as the figure 2 below shows.
The figure 3 below shows a comparison between the performance of CDAM and KLCI from April 1998 to April 2017. If an investor opened an account worth RM100,000 with CDAM in April 1998, by April 2017, the investment would have grown to RM1,053,875. But if the investor had invested RM100,000 in KLCI, the investment would have only grown to RM284,808.
Even if the investor invested with CDAM during the peak of the market in early 2000, the returns would be close to 4 times after 17 years. If someone invested in KLCI at the said peak, the investment would only be close to double.
The performance of CDAM for the period 27 April 1998 to 31 Dec 2015 has been independently verified. The performance of CDAM for the period 1 Jan 2016 to 28 April 2017 is believed to be reliable, but has not been independently verified. Past performance and any forecast are not necessarily indicative of future or likely performance.